The 25% Law: How Society Is Building a Mirror of the Human Brain

We tend to think of artificial intelligence as something profoundly unnatural—a technological creation made from silicon, copper, data centers, and electricity.

But there may be another way to look at it.

As digital society expands, an intriguing parallel is emerging between the way energy is distributed inside the human body and the way energy is increasingly being consumed by the world’s digital infrastructure. The similarity raises a provocative possibility:

Human civilization may not simply be inventing artificial intelligence. We may be recreating, at planetary scale, the same organizational logic already found within ourselves.

The human brain is an extraordinarily energy-intensive organ. Though it represents only a small fraction of the body’s mass, it consumes a remarkably large share of the body’s available energy. Its disproportionate energy demand reflects the enormous amount of information processing, coordination, signaling, memory, and decision-making taking place within it.

Now consider what is happening to society.

For most of industrial history, electricity powered primarily physical activities: lighting homes, running factories, moving machinery, heating buildings, and operating transportation systems. Increasingly, however, enormous quantities of energy are being redirected toward information processing—data centers, cloud computing, telecommunications, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.

In other words, civilization is beginning to devote a growing share of its energy not merely to moving matter, but to processing information.

That is exactly what a brain does.

This is where the idea of the 25% Law becomes interesting. If the energy devoted to computation and information processing eventually approaches roughly the same proportion that biological organisms devote to their own nervous systems and brains, then the parallel becomes difficult to dismiss as merely poetic.

The similarity is not that a data center physically resembles a brain.

It is that both systems may obey a deeper organizational principle:

As a system becomes more complex, an increasing proportion of its available energy must be devoted to sensing, communicating, coordinating, remembering, predicting, and deciding.

A brain performs those functions for a body.

Our emerging digital network increasingly performs them for civilization.

Seen this way, the rapidly growing web of data centers, fiber-optic networks, sensors, satellites, mobile devices, and AI systems begins to resemble a planetary nervous system. Individual data centers could be thought of less as isolated machines and more as processing nodes within an increasingly interconnected whole.

And that leads to an even more provocative thought.

Perhaps intelligence is not something nature invented once and humanity is now artificially reproducing. Perhaps intelligence is what complex systems naturally begin to build when they reach a certain scale.

Cells formed nervous systems.

Nervous systems formed brains.

Human beings formed societies.

And societies may now be constructing their own information-processing layer.

From this perspective, artificial intelligence becomes somewhat less artificial.

It may represent the next recurrence of a much older pattern: matter organizing itself into increasingly sophisticated centers of sensing, information processing, coordination, and response.

The most interesting question, then, may not be whether machines will someday become like us.

It may be whether, without fully realizing it, we have been building something in our own image all along.

For the full paper, click here.

Buddhism — A Map Drawn by the Universe Itself

In a time when the loudest voices seem to win the day, it is quietly reassuring that Buddhism — the unassuming discipline of stillness, restraint, and clear seeing — remains enduringly compelling.

Its appeal is not accidental: many people sense that its core teachings feel unusually real, as if they resonate with something fundamental about how life works.

This paper explores that intuition through the Centerlife formulation, proposing that Buddhism’s key tenets mirror the universe’s underlying creative process — the same generative order that yields not only complexity, but the harmony and balance evident throughout nature and cosmos.

To make this case, we first outline the creative process as described in Centerlife, then trace its correspondences with foundational Buddhist principles.

Click here to view the paper.

What If Harmony Isn’t Something You Create?

What If Harmony Isn’t Something You Create?

What if harmony is something that naturally emerges.. if you know nature’s secret?

We’re taught to pursue balance.

Work–life balance.
Emotional balance.
Financial balance.
Inner peace.

The assumption is simple: harmony is something you achieve. Something you assemble through discipline, optimization, and better choices.

But what if harmony isn’t something you build?

What if it’s something that appears — on its own — when a deeper structure is sound?

Read the rest of the artilce here:

Medium Article:  Click Here

Substack Article: Click Here

Why Beauty? (The Origins of Beauty Paper)

Beauty isn’t just a matter of taste. Across nature—atoms, stars, shells, flowers, faces—beauty shows up with striking consistency, wearing the same signatures: symmetry, balance, wholeness, and effortless coherence.

The Origins of Beauty paper explores a simple, reassuring idea: beauty naturally emerges when creation organizes from a center outward. When a center is clear and undistorted, the “field” around it gathers parts into harmony—and beauty becomes the visible (and felt) proof that coherence has taken hold.

Drawing on insights from John O’Donohue, Louie Schwartzberg, and modern psychology, this essay also shows why humans recognize beauty so deeply—and how we can live in beauty by emulating nature’s principles through CenterLife.

You can find the paper at this link.

New Paper: Centers and the Animation of Matter

I’ve been fascinated with systems and chaos theory for years however just ran across Michael Levin’s brilliant works on morphogenesis and agency. A few podcasts later, I realized just how closely some of the ideas resonated with concepts explored in my Centerpath Papers from years back.

The result is attached metaphysical paper “Centers and the Origins of Agency – Morphogenic Fields and the Animation of Matter”.

It was a joy to write and connected many dots for me including those between centers, form, and the mysterious spark that animates matter. Hope you enjoy! Centers and the Origins of Agency

2nd Annual Forest Bathing Conference: Nature and the Future of Wellness

Earlier this month, I had the honor of presenting at the 2nd Annual International Forest Therapy Conference, held at the stunning IBC campus in Vancouver. This gathering brought together nature-based practitioners, researchers, and wellness leaders from around the globe to explore the intersection of nature, health, and human well being.

My session focused on three transformative frameworks that together form the foundation of my work:
NaturePath – Understanding How Nature Works
NatureSpeaks – Adopting Her Wisdom
Nature’s Mirror – Aligning Your Life with Nature

The response was incredibly encouraging, inspiring a renewed sense of energy and collaborations on the horizon.